Contextual Deontic Logic Violation Contexts and Factual Defeasibility
نویسنده
چکیده
In this article we introduce Contextual Deontic Logic (Cdl) to analyze the relation between deontic, contextual and defeasible reasoning. The optimal state, and therefore the set of active obligations, can change radically when the violation context changes. In such cases we say that the obligations only in force in the previous violation context are defeated; contextual deontic logic is therefore a defeasible deontic logic. This is expressed by the deenition O(j) =def O(jn:): ` ought to be (done) if is (done) in the context where is (done)' is deened as` ought to be (done) if is (done) unless : is (done).' The unless clause formalizes explicit exceptions and is analogous to the justiication in Reiter's default rules. Cdl is a monotonic defeasible deontic logic, because it has factual defeasibility but not overridden defeasibility.
منابع مشابه
An Update Semantics for Prima Facie Obligations
The deontic logic dus is a deontic update semantics for prescriptive obligations based on the update semantics of Veltman. In dus the definition of logical validity of obligations is not based on static truth values but on dynamic action transitions. In this paper prescriptive prima facie obligations are formalized in update semantics. The logic formalizes the specificity principle, has reinsta...
متن کاملViolation Contexts and Deontic Independence
In this paper we discuss the role of context and independence in normative reasoning. First, deontic operators { obligations, prohibitions , permissions { referring to the ideal context may connict with operators referring to a violation (or contrary-to-duty) context. Second, deontic independence is a powerful concept to derive deontic operators from such operators of other violation contexts. ...
متن کاملCancelling and Overshadowing: Two Types of Defeasibility in Defeasible Deontic Logic
IN this paper we give a general analysis of dyadic, deontir logics that were introduced in the earlv eventies to formalize deontic reason ing about subideal behavior Recently it was observed that they are closely related to non monotonic logics, theories of diagnosis and dc cision theories In particular, we argue that two types of defeasibihty must be distinguished in a defeasible deontic log...
متن کاملDynamic Normative Reasoning Under Uncertainty: How to Distinguish Between Obligations Under Uncertainty and Prima Facie Obligations
The deontic update semantics is a dynamic semantics for prescriptive obligations based on Veltman's update semantics, in which the dynamic evaluation of connicts of hierarchic obligations naturally leads to defeasibility. In this paper we use this dynamic semantics to study the diagnostic problem of defeasible deontic logic. For example, consider a defeasible obligationòught to be done' togethe...
متن کاملTowards a Computational Treatment of Deontic Defeasibility
In this paper we describe an algorithmic framework for a multi-modal logic arising from the combination of the system of modal (epistemic) logic devised by Meyer and van der Hoek for dealing with nonmonotonic reasoning with a deontic logic of the Jones and Pörn-type. The idea behind this (somewhat eclectic) formal set-up is to have a modal framework expressive enough to model certain kinds of d...
متن کامل